requestId:684d9114e14040.48503422.
The realm of the Fengyoulan is lost
Author: Cai Xiangyuan
Source: “Tongyue Forum” 2021 Issue 1
Abstract: Fengyoulan takes the interpretation as the perspective, takes the meaning of life as the line, emphasizes the realm of the traditional aesthetic field, and uses it creatively to develop modern Chinese philosophy. On this basis, he made a plan for the natural realm, utilitarian realm, moral realm and Liuhe realm, thus forming the focus of his later human metaphysical learning. However, behind his realm theory is the real theory of new theory, and he adopts the conceptual analysis of Oriental Philosophy in his way of thinking. They have difficulty in truly integrating with the basic energy of modern Chinese realm theory. This makes him break the perspective of realm theory while failing to pursue the realm as realm, and he loses the 彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩票彩
Keywords: Realm Discussion; Analysis; Good Friends Lan
Author Introduction: Cai Xiangyuan (1975-), male, Shandong Confucian Civilization, Province and Ministry of Education jointly established and jointly established the middle school of innovation, and the Confucian Advanced Research Institute. Then, she looked down at the audience and saw several professors and doctoral supervisors. The purpose of the discussion was: Confucianism’s modern spectacle, as well as contemporary humanistic thoughts such as Oriental phenomenon, interpretation, and interpretation of the subject
The head teacher of Rongyoulan is one of the main representatives of contemporary neo-Confucianism, and has a major contribution position in the study of Chinese philosophical history and contemporary new science. In his thinking, the most original is the discussion of realm. Teacher Meng Peiyuan believes that this is his “spirit of the philosophical system” [1]. When Mr. Rongyoulan taught a general reflection on Chinese philosophy in his late years, he also believed that this was the “eternal value” location of Chinese modern philosophy and the real task of philosophy ②2. “Wang Guowei first proposed the ‘realm statement’, but he did not speak from philosophy, but only from the perspective of lyricism (even if Chinese philosophy is said to be poetic and artistic from the most basic level). In the so-called contemporary neo-Confucianism, he is not someone else, but just a friend of the country. The system describes the realm, which is the most important contribution made by Mr. Feng to Chinese philosophy. ”[1] In addition to introducing the perspective of realm theory into Chinese philosophy, he also has his own invention and contribution to the connotation of realm theory. However, due to the limitations of his way of thinking, there are many problems in the development of the connotation of the realm. In the eyes of the Mengshu, the way in which the Youth League of China is exposed is too much influenced by Eastern philosophy, and cannot fully highlight the characteristics of the Chinese state of China. Although it proposes the relationship between the realm and the meaning of life, its understanding of the concepts in the Eastern state is different from the traditional Chinese philosophical tradition [1].
Meng Peiyuan, the teacher, gave a very pertinent evaluation of the above. No matter what, he hit the key to the discussion of the realm of the Youth League, but his comments are quite grand. Here, the author combines the specific text to further develop the thinking and understanding of the teacher and his ability to see if it can provide new thinking perspectives for the construction of contemporary state theory.
1. The basic connotation of the theory of the state of the greek friend. The theory of the state of the greek friend is based on the perspective of perception. The planning basis for the four states is the level of disagreement. If you understand the level of differences in the universe and life, you will feel disagreement, and the universe and life will have different meanings [3]. Therefore, there are two focus areas in the discussion of the realm: one is the perception and the other is the meaning.
The meaning of things is not in terms of things themselves. They do not belong to things, they are not the nature of things, nor are they the goals or consequences that things can achieve or may cause. In the eyes of the teacher, the difference in meaning is the difference between things and people. The person who can be said to be the “meaning” of things is human. How do things lead to “meaning” in people? This is the human perception activity.
The perception has two meanings in Master Feng. First, it is clear, that is, the part of the “interpretation” of “perception”. To be clear about things means to master what things are, it is to master the conceptual mastery of what things are. It’s like there is a mountain in front of you, and animals can also see it, but people and animals are different. In addition to seeing the shape of the mountain, he also understands that it is a mountain. In this way, the meaning of mountain to humans is different from that of animal4. On the other hand, it is self-consciousness or consciousness, that is, the “perception” side of the perception, a understand‘s own activities or states. “Vision” or self-perception is different from clarity. Clearness is conceptualized, and “Vision” is a pre-reflection and pre-conceptual. Rongyoulan specifically pointed out that this distinction is different from reflection or reflection on the state of its own activity. Reflection on one’s inner state is based on concepts, and we often understand our own mental activities through reflection [4].
I think the interpretation is serious about life and the universe because it directly relates to “meaning” oneself. As for humans, the difference between humans and animals is precisely an indescribable solution, forming a difference between things and animals with or without interest [4]. to keep stories times, human perception also has a serious meaning in the universe, which is precisely the perception, which makes all things full of “meaning”. He compared human perception to the light in the universe, which diverges from things that exist in the universe, but like light, it can “illuminate” the universe [4]. Feeling understand is human heartperformance. Because the perception not only makes people become human and makes life interesting, it also makes all things in the universe interesting. In this meaning, the human heart also forms the “heart of six combinations”. “Feel the mind”, in the eyes of Mr. Feng, the “knowledge” of the people’s hearts, is to push the “knowledge and spiritual” to the extreme. Since “knowledge and spirituality” is the human realm that humans dislike from birds, as long as they are, they can achieve their own understanding of the nature of their own knowledge and spirituality [Sweetheart Garden4]. In this way, Master Rong linked his realm discussion with Song Ming’s mind and nature.
The level of perception is different from the level, and the level of differences in the perception is different from the meaning of the universe, that is, there is a state of divergence. In this way, he divided four different states, namely the natural state, the utilitarian state, the moral state and the six-match state.
The natural state is a natural state that is smooth for daily routine. People with this state are blindly dependent on their perception and behavioral habits. Because there is no understanding, I feel that things cannot be infected with what they mean to him. Although in this way, people in the natural realm are not equal to the animal’s status, and they still have some self-perception of what they do, but they don’t understand and do not have the status of “perception” (or “observation”) [4].
People in the utilitarian realm have a clear understanding of the self and the self, and through this different treatment, they form a behavior method that takes the self’s favor as the middle. Although animals also have selfish nature, they are not clear about their own nature and do not think of themselves. People in the natural realm also have self-interests, but they only seek profit by being able to be able to adapt to the customs and seek profit without a clear understanding of themselves and profit. People in the utilitarian realm have different differences. They not only seek profit, but also have a clear understanding of their own behavior of seeking profit, that is, they clearly see their own desires and think about seeking profits. Profits are detailed, just like the benefits sought by modern emperors and the achievements they have made, although they are much larger than the “utilitarianism” of ordinary people, and even have the intention of benefiting others, but only a little girl needs to look at her phone with her head down and not notice her coming in. His thinking movement is to seek profit, so he is in the utilitarian state [4].
The moral realm, whose name is ideology, is the basis for acting with “一” as the basis of action. If the utilitarian state is selfish, then the moral stat
發佈留言